
\begin{table}[htb]
\caption{Additional evidence: specific actors, environmental and labour provisions, and PTA support (Rating above 5)}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{l c c}
\hline
 & Model 7S & Model 8S \\
\hline
(Intercept)                           & $-1.98 \; (0.28)^{***}$ & $-2.27 \; (0.32)^{***}$ \\
Services                              & $-0.07 \; (0.20)$       & $-0.04 \; (0.20)$       \\
IPR                                   & $0.16 \; (0.18)$        & $0.12 \; (0.18)$        \\
Environment                           & $1.25 \; (0.23)^{***}$  & $1.52 \; (0.22)^{***}$  \\
Labour                                & $0.92 \; (0.19)^{***}$  & $0.84 \; (0.24)^{***}$  \\
Environmental citizen groups          & $-2.15 \; (0.73)^{**}$  &                         \\
Environ. x Environ. citizen groups    & $2.52 \; (0.83)^{**}$   &                         \\
Labour policy citizen groups          &                         & $0.19 \; (0.36)$        \\
Labour x Labour policy citizen groups &                         & $0.17 \; (0.38)$        \\
\hline
AIC                                   & $760.84$                & $775.06$                \\
Deviance                              & $746.84$                & $761.06$                \\
N                                     & $700$                   & $700$                   \\
\hline
\multicolumn{3}{l}{\scriptsize{\parbox{.65\linewidth}{$^{***}p<0.001$; $^{**}p<0.01$; $^{*}p<0.05$. Estimates from an logistic regression. Standard errors in parentheses. Dependent variable (PTA support) is a dummy.}}}
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:additional_evidence2_above5}
\end{center}
\end{table}
